|
The Peace of Constantine, inaugurated in 313, marks an important turning point in the history of the Church. From an illegal religion, Christianity became legally tolerated, and this position was soon transformed into one of privileged liberty. The Christians rejoiced, and rightly so, in being able to profess their faith without being harassed. But this change brought with it grave new pastoral problems, especially when it became the official religion instead of being only a permitted religion. I shall first take up these new problems, and we shall see that they were very far from indicating any qualitative progress. In the face of the laxity brought about by the facility created by the inception of a Christian regime, the bishops struggled to maintain the same authenticity in the administration of the sacraments that was known in the preceding missionary centuries. The New Problems The Defective Motivation for Conversion For example, sometimes the request for entry into the catechumenate was motivated by the desire to marry a Christian. Though this could well constitute a point of departure, it often led some to simulate a faith they did not have. These cases were not rare. Thus in Jerusalem, Cyril wanted to discriminate between the candidates who presented their names for baptism:
Cyril mentions the desire to please a master or a friend, and some of these friends were in "high places," so baptism was being requested for reasons of political ambition. In fact, one became a "Christian" by virtue of the rite of entry into the catechumenate and this simple title facilitated access to public positions. Ambrose, Bishop of Milan, courageously denounced this practice:
What is serious in all this, says Ambrose, is hypocrisy and duplicity:
To these hypocrites, Augustine opposes the case of someone who wants sincerely to become a Christian and not "to obtain the hand of a Christian girl he wants to marry." 5 This is why he advises constant vigilance regarding the motives that lead someone to request instruction:
The Postponement of Baptism This problem also arose for children whose Christian parents entered them into the catechumenate but who were never given any further instruction in the Christian faith. Therefore, they remained catechumens for life unless they underwent a true conversion when they were older. Basil, Gregory of Nazianzus, Augustine, and many others were in this category. Augustine, when he was very young, had been "signed with the sign of the cross of (Christ) and seasoned with his salt." During an illness, baptism was discussed, but when his health improved he again delayed the reception of the sacrament. He finally was baptized at the age of thirty-three, that is, after his conversion. 7 What should we think of these adults who became Christians without any desire to request baptism? Though they bore the name, they were not in fact Christians since they were not converted. The bishops did not cease protesting vigorously against such abuses. In the West, it was customary on Epiphany for preachers to try to awaken these slumbering catechumens so that they would "give their names" at the beginning of Lent with a view to baptism on the coming Easter. But their appeals often remained fruitless. The sadness of a bishop like Ambrose was great when, in commenting on the miraculous catch of Lk 4:5, he noted that none had responded:
Basil earnestly invited those already "conceived" (by entrance into the catechumenate) to accept the sacrament that would "bring them into the world":
Gregory of Nazianzus worked unceasingly to prove that there was absolutely no valid reason to defer baptism:
Gregory of Nyssa also denounced as detestable the motives alleged: under a false show of humility, it was actually a refusal to renounce sin that held back these people who were comparable to the unprofitable servant who hid his talent. 11 "It is not sufficient to be conceived," wrote Augustine, "it is necessary to be born again to come to eternal life." 12 With the same vigor, John Chrysostom fought against the custom of postponing baptism until one was in extremis:
Such inertia, moreover, constituted a scandal that was highly amusing to the pagans. If one truly believed in the greatness of the sacrament, why wait until one was ill? This would be like a soldier who waits for the war to be over before going to battle. 14 In reality, this custom reveals the depths to which the catechumenate had fallen. The title of catechumen had lost its profound significance, since it no longer corresponded to a true conversion, so the catechumenate itself declined. Scandalized by this massive indifference, the bishops hurried the catechumens into baptism, with all the attendant dangers of formalism. Much was said about catechumens in this period, but though there were many catechumens, there were few true converts. Whether it was a question of children who had not yet given their assent to the truth even though they had been instructed in the rudiments of the faith, or adults who entered the Church for defective motives, the title no longer corresponded to the reality it expressed formerly. Nevertheless, pastors never forgot the theological exigencies of an authentic sacramental ministry. The Permanent Concern for Authenticity, the next chapter of A History of the Catechumenate, will be posted next Thursday. For information about ordering this book, please see Sadlier's Religion Catalog.
|