|
Admission to the Catechumenate
Here again is the examination of admission to the catechumenate that was mentioned by Hippolytus. In addition to affirming the practice, Origen also gives us information on the preliminary evangelization of which the Apostolic Tradition does not speak. The first instructions, according to Origen, concerned mainly the awakening of faith, and it was done in homes and workshops and not in a formal way. What we would today call, very inexactly, the "precatechumenate" was then living contact with Christians. It was evangelical witness, with the Christians playing more the role of sponsors than of teachers. What was involved was the radiation of a Christian community inserted in the larger human community, not intellectual instruction by an institutional staff. Hippolytus speaks only of the examination of admission to the catechumenate and does not describe the accompanying liturgical rite that changed a postulant into a catechumen. In a passage in his "Exhortation to Martyrdom," Origen possibly alludes to this rite. When writing to Christians who were frightened at the prospect of the supreme sacrifice, he reminded them of the commitment they had made on the specific occasion of beginning catechesis. If this commitment had not been made, the catechist would have had nothing more to do with them, as Origen shows in this fictitious dialogue:
Such a text-and this one seems to be unknown to many historians of the catechumenate-gives a good idea of what could have been the decision of faith demanded of the postulant before admission to catechesis. Note that these are the same words as those used in the dialogue of Joshua with the Hebrews at the sealing of the covenant at Shechem (Jos. 24:14-24). These are decisive covenant formulas, and those who enter the covenant are themselves witnesses of their commitment (Jos. 22:22,27). Thus the commencement of catechesis presupposes an event analogous to the sealing of the covenant at Shechem. This is why it is appropriate to apply this text to catechumens, and the way in which Origen teaches them to read their experience in the very word of God is admirable. Although Origen clearly states that a commitment was made at the start of catechesis, we do not know its form. Was there a liturgical rite, a specific meeting? Probably. But Origen's text does not warrant such an affirmation since it is clear that the words are placed by Origen in the mouths of the catechist and the catechumens and were not spoken as such. Rather, their purpose is to convey the value and the validity of the commitment. The Catechumenal Period
The first group consisted of the catechumens in the strict sense of the word; the second were the "chosen ones," who had virtually finished their formation. They were chosen by the Church as being suitable for baptism because it saw that they could live as Christians, not simply because they want to. It is of them that Origen writes further on: But when some of those who have been thus encouraged make progress and show that they have been purified by the Logos, and do all in their power to live better lives, then we call them to our mysteries. 64 As in Rome, the two examinations, for admission to the catechumenate and to baptism were thus applied very seriously and both involved a transformation of life. Moreover, it was not the candidate himself who judged his own aptitude but the members of the Church who were designated for this function and whose judgment was based on the testimony of the Christians who evangelized him. This is very clear for the admission to the stages of the catechumenate:
In Syria and Palestine ca. 250, the next chapter of A History of the Catechumenate, will be posted next Thursday. For information about ordering this book, please see Sadlier's Religion Catalog.
|